CHESS AND ACADEMICS
by Demola Sorungbe
These two distinct terms are quite related. As we all know,
chess requires you to think, at times to great depths and the resultant positive
effect of such thought is quite considerable. Attaining academic excellence also
requires a great deal of brain tasking. The game of chess therefore is often
related to academia and people of "high intelligence' . Statistics and science
have shown that most chess players are at least above average as regards
intellect.
However, the fact remains that not all chess players do well
in school. In fact, most of them are either on the average or below average.
“Academic failure” should not ordinarily be attributed to chess, but it is quite
possible that a lot of chess players in, Nigeria, would have done better in
school if it they weren't that involved in the game although it is also true
that some of them could and would have found something else to take their time
if they weren’t chess players.
Where there is enough evidence to prove that
chess contributes to academic success, it’s quite difficult to link it with
“academic failure”. The truth is chess, like any other thing you can't control,
can be quite addictive and can result in a lot of negative consequences. The
quest to win may cause a player to spend so much physical and mental time trying
to improve his/her level of play, thereby loosing sight of academic success.
Truth be told, it is very important in our present day Nigeria to excel
academically, particularly because one cannot make a living solely from chess. A
person that invests so much time in chess at the expense of his/her academic
work starts to under-perform academically and could become less bothered with
academics and related issues. There is then the tendency for such a person to
seek solace in chess . All these tend to happen unconsciously, and except a
player realizes what is happening he/she may be lost, for a very long
time.
I will describe the point at which a chess player, or anybody for
that matter, draws a very distinct line between chess and other important
aspects of life as the “point of maturity”. It takes quite a while for a chess
player to get “matured”. For this reason, chess players have to be conscious,
and should be able to evaluate their life at every point in time.
This may
explain why most academically successful chess players are those that learnt the
game quite sometime before being admitted into the higher institution and vice
versa. In other words, academic success can be said to be directly proportional
to the time proximity between the point of learning the game and the point of
being admitted into the higher institution.
Finally, I will like to say that though
there are no distinct rules governing life; one has to be conscious and
realistic and always remember, there are more important things (not too many I
hope!) than chess.